AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
We are strong together chain4/30/2023 And I speak from experience as I've mentored and trained new employees. and that can all quickly bring a company down as we know. Then it will start to negatively affect operations, customer service, etc. That kind of poor attitude and misalignment with the company's culture can become like a cancer to a company. But, here's the thing, if this underperforming employee shows no desire to change their attitude and shows no willingness to work hard to improve, then this person and them company should probably part ways. And the supervisor or work leader should meet with them every week or two until they show progress and get closer to the job performance targets. They could also shadow for a few days a high-performing employee and they will hopefully pick-up their effective work habits and adopt some of their processes and techniques. Whatever the case, start from the ground and work their way up. They may be unaware, either at their own fault or an oversite with training. Some ideas are to first, make sure they are aware and have read their business unit's standard operating procedures (SOPs) and are aware of all of the key policies and are utilizing the accepted processes in how they go about their work. The rationale for taking the time to get them on-track versus just firing them, is that the company has already invested time and resources and bringing them on and maybe they have some other redeeming skills. If an employee is struggling to keep up with their assigned workload and is underperforming, it is up to their supervisor/ team lead and perhaps senior teammates to help improve their performance and help them cover skill gaps. I have always believed this quote says a lot, "A society is judged by how it treats their weakest members." With that, perhaps we can say a company is judged how it treats their weakest employees. Good choice of topic Phil as this issue is always relevant to businesses and any organization. Any views or opinions expressed in this LinkedIn article are mine and do not represent the views of any professional, institutions, or companies that I may or may not be affiliated with within a professional or personal capacity unless previously stated. If you enjoyed reading this article today, please like and share it with colleagues on Linkidin.ĭisclaimer. Thanks for reading this article on Linkidin. In the team weekly meeting, give a few minutes were new productive ideas are brainstormed and tried for one month. Also, in the digital age, new productive ideas can germinate each day from web blogs, journals, and podcasts. Another idea is holding each team member accountable to the same standards for getting the work done. I think one way to avoid complacency and hubris is having team members rotate into different jobs, and projects so their skill sets stay relevant. You don't stay great by allowing complacency and hubris to germinate in a nation or company. Hubris led to the downfall of many leaders and their nations over the past two thousand years. Hubris sets in and criticisms and critiques of the team performance are ignored. The team leaders start to disengage from the team, and productivity drops. " We always have done things this way!" becomes the team mantra. Further, the team starts to take shortcuts just to complete work on time. Complacency can get into the DNA of a very productive team. One issue that arises in teams is complacency. What are some things that can weaken a team's ability to win in the digital age? A hypothetical example is listed below. In the digital age, teams work across diverse software platforms, as well as, with each team member's unique strengths and weaknesses in communication skills. How does this relate to team productivity in the digital age? Why is one link weaker compared to the other links in the chain? A mistake in the design process of the bicycle chain? The link was damaged during a bicycle ride? Proper maintenance wasn't performed on the bicycle? A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. If one link is malfunctioning shouldn't the other links pick up the proverbial slack? Has anyone ever ridden a bicycle whose chain had a broken link? Ergo, a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. Basically, a chain is composed of parts that work together to perform a particular action. The saying comes from Thomas Reid's Essays on the intellectual powers of man which was published in 1786. Everyone knows the cliché that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |